China is being watched carefully by global leader for every of China's foreign and economic policies and moves. Every foreign investors and expatriates are influenced by private views molded from their country, geographical region and political opinions. Security developments in China are different and that makes relations between the other parts of the world under pressure. There are safety concerns due to China's rising economic power. Many welcome the accomplishment that had pulled the world's growth. However, most Americans view it as a threatening situation to their own country's world standing. European citizens do not view China as a political threat but have similar concerns that China may forcefully preach their own development values. Most of the world do not see it as threatening, but there is diverse views among the people of world.

About 60% of Americans were concerned on China's rising might in economic power and about 75% think it is no trustworthy. China may have been though to contribute to US trade deficits and capturing the labor markets with low wages offered. Many filed complaints with WTO on China's perceived unfair subsidized export markets. US has used to basis for non-exclusion of China in the Trans Pacific Partnerships. On a side interesting note, Chinese people are fond of US, with surveys showing Chinese people admiring American innovative values and scientific achievements. US had an overwhelming advantage in exercising its subtle power image to complement its military might.

The perception for US and China relationship is influenced by economic trends. China emerged as the world's biggest trading country at the same time America is nursing from economic injury and recovering slowly from the 2008 subprime financial crisis. Europe was soon having fiscal budget issues around 2011. Gallup polls revealed that most Americans held the belief that China is the biggest economy in the world. It was completely different in 2000 where only 10% of American people thought China as the top while a huge 65% majority thought US as the top. Americans has good rating for China up till 2010. Sentiments turned for the worse as China becomes more aggressive in island dispute and negotiations. U.S. is seeking to rebalance its power and influence in Asia. Other parts of the globe sees US as main economic power and most Asian nations held the same view. Europe thinks it is otherwise by supporting China as the top economic superpower.

China's strong trade balance is the main reason U.S. and Europe views China as the top economic superpower. China has large trade surpluses against U.S. and Europe. However it has had trade deficits with other parts of the world, in particular commodity producers and Eastern Asian neighbors. There are considerable insecurity in the Western regions on their competitiveness. A country's true measure of economic resilience is more from its institutional quality and human capital development, which is represented more by GDP per capita and less by trade balance amount. China has only a GDP per capita ranking of 80 compared to world and not ready to take pole position.

Europeans have a more positive feelings for China compared to U.S. as there is lower power rivalry. They are also trying to avoid U.S. linked initiatives. There is wide perception difference between official opinions and popular opinions in Western Europe. Chinese and German economic relationship seem to be the strongest in Europe, but surveys showed that German public are less positive about China, perhaps due to cultural differences. Many would have the view that British would view China in an unfavorable light caused by Hong Kong's treatment by China and trade deficits that are large. In actual reality, there are extensive personal interactions built upon by tourism and financial links. Britain took the first initiative within EU to join China led Asian Infrastructure Investments Bank.

Outside of Europe and U.S., there are diverse views on China. It varies significantly by region and time period. After the Asia Financial Crisis, views on China become less favorable by Asian nations when they provided economic support. Island dispute dominate the headline in today's time. Latin America and African economy enjoyed good growth led by China's rise, but a slowdown is dimming their prospects. Public perception towards China is shaped by foreign and economic policy concerns. China has a huge challenge to deal with the complicated relationships when the whole world is slowing down economically.

The nation's monetary markets are developing, foreign investments continue pouring in, and wealth is streaming outward. What would it take to attain an innovative part of world lender? China, as the world's biggest saver, has a unique role to play in the worldwide monetary rebalancing toward developing markets. Today, these nation expresses 38 % of overall GDP yet represent only 7 % of global foreign investments in values and just 13 % of worldwide international lending.

Their part appears to be ready to develop in the moving post-crisis budgetary scene since the propelled economies face slow development and calming demographic patterns. As the leading man in that move, China could turn into a genuine worldwide lender and, with some change, set up the renminbi as a noteworthy universal currency.

So far, a long-closed economy— one, even with even above 3 trillion dollars in foreign capital— can't swing its entryways open overnight. China's local money related markets will need to extend and grow further, and revenues earned by companies, government and family units must be ascent if the nation is to draw in and convey more capital successfully. And equally the obstructions that keep people and organizations from capitalizing freely outside the environs of China, and strangers from capitalizing on them, will need to reduce bit by bit, and the nation must create the trust of worldwide financial specialists. Proceeded with a change in China, combined with its endless household investment funds and outsized part in world exchange, could make the nation one of the world's most prominent suppliers of capital in years to come.

Development and developing agonies in China's business sectors

As opposed to most growing economies, where loaning has been stagnant in the midst of the extensive deleveraging, bank advances in China have developed by 5.8 trillion dollars since 2007, achieving 132 % of GDP—higher than the propelled economy healthy of 123 %. Around 85 % of that Chinese loaning has been to organizations; family units represent the rest. This quick development has raised the apparition of a glory bubble and a future ascent in nonperforming advances. However, controllers have endeavored to moderate the pace in overheated territories, for example, land.

China's corporate-stock business sector is likewise evolving. Securities remarkably from nonfinancial organizations have developed by 45 % every year in the course of recent years, securities from monetary establishments by 23 %. There is adequate space for further development since China's levels of security business sector obtaining are altogether beneath those of cutting edge economies. For sure, security financing could give an option origination of capital for the nation's extending corporate segment, empowering banks to expand their loaning to families and little and fair size ventures.

Dissimilar to other numerous real value markets, China's securities exchange has not bounced back after the fiscal emergency and worldwide recession. Absolute market capitalization has reduced by 50 % since 2007, diving from 7.2 trillion dollars in 2007 to 3.6 trillion dollars in the second quarter of 2012. Financial specialists sent valuations taking off at the business sector's crest. However, fears of a lull and a more reasonable perspective of organization costs hosted their eagerness, underscoring the way that China's value markets, similar to those of other rising economies, stay focus to sharp swings.

Cross-fringe venture surges

China has challenged global patterns in cross-outskirt capital streams, which caved in 2008 and remain 60 % beneath their precrisis crest. For China, by difference, remote direct venture (FDI), cross-fringe advances and deposits, and outside portfolio reserves in values and security are 44 % more than 2007 levels (Exhibition 2). Aggregate outside speculation into China came to 477 billion dollars towards the end of 2011, surpassing the 2007 top of 331 billion dollars.

Foreign organizations, anxious to build up existence in China, represent about 66% of the inflows. Resources from the external establishment and discrete financial specialists could give another leg to development as long-standing limitations on foreign portfolio venture keep on easing. The quantity of experienced foreign institutional investors affirmed by Chinese controllers has increased since 2005 with a total of 33 drivers to a total of 207 in 2012 and will certainly still improve. Controllers likewise are giving enlisted foreign subsidies and more scope to put their property of renminbi offshore in China's local capital markets. Both actions have additional opened the way to foreign investment in those business sectors.

Notably, the country's central bank, the People's Bank of China, has gained the world's biggest stock of foreign-currency investments; in 2012, it was 3.3 trillion dollars. While most of this cash is capitalized into safe sovereign liabilities —for example, US treasuries, which represent about 1.2 trillion dollars of China's saves—the development in such ventures has impeded extensively. Rather, China is both extricating confinements on different sorts of money-related surges and moving to broaden its foreign assets. That was the driving force behind the 2007 establishment of the China Venture Organization, one of the world's biggest sovereign funds stores, with resources of 482 billion dollars. The organization's possessions incorporate shares in a considerable lot of the world's blue-chip organizations; vitality, mining, and infrastructure ventures; worldwide landed property; and a stake in Heathrow Airport, London.

Chinese institutions are likewise trading up their part in the world's finance. Foreign direct ventures by both state-claimed and private division; Chinese groups developed from just 1 billion dollars in the year 2000 to 101 billion dollars in 2011. Toward the end of 2011, Chinese groups represented 364 billion dollars of world's foreign direct ventures, with the vast majority of it secured to commodities. Nearly half of these reserves went to other developing markets—an offer higher than that for organizations in cutting-edge economies.

A lot of China's quickly expanding global loaning is attached to foreign speculation transacts including Chinese establishments (for example, financing a mine in Peru, with an erection to be embarked on by a Chinese organization). Exceptional foreign credits and loans totalled 838 billion dollars toward the end of 2011. To put this entirety in context, consider the way that the aggregate level of loans outstanding from five of the world's noteworthy mutual improvement banks is about 500 billion dollars. Subsequently from 2009, Chinese lends to America (Latin) have surpassed those of both the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank.

As China's monetary markets have turned out to be more vigorous and more profound, the estimation of its local financial assets—including securities, equities, and advances—tallies to about 7.4 trillion dollars, trailing Japan and USA. That is a more than ten times the increment in a range of two decades, and it does exclude Hong Kong's role in directing assets to and from China.

Financial market regulators commented that there are loopholes in their guidelines to regulate the wealth management space and protect lay investors. CSRC and CBRC has tried making new laws. There are still gaps in the regulatory space due to rapid growth for wealth management. The combined assets managed by banks, insurance companies, trust funds and fund managers almost exceed 90trillion yuan. There are risks surfacing as the sector grows. Regulators are starting to doubt the regulations as inadequate. There are regulatory holes need to be plugged. For instance, CBRC decided on reducing risk by asking banks to split the lending and wealth management business. Regulation was in draft but never really executed due to disagreements. There were great arguments over the split.

Stock market bear downturn went against wealth manager's investing performance. Insurance companies who had vested interest in stock markets has seen their asset value fall. Banking officials pointed at the regulators for encouraging risk taking by wealth managers. There was no good coordination between different agencies. Asset management sector is getting messier due proliferation of complicated investment package. Chinese banks controlled biggest portion of funds in 2015 and are invested via wealth management space. Trusts, securities firms, insurance companies and fund corporations were handling 16trillion, 12 trillion, 11 trillion and 9 trillion yuan respectively. Smartphones and internetas well as interest rate drops all pushed retail investors and huge financial outfits to investment in these wealth management package.

Sales proceeds from these products were ploughed into the equity markets. Asset managers are risking the funds on stock markets in Shenzhen and Shanghai. Some invested in corporate bonds and private placement. A total of about 7trillion yuan is invested into stocks, bonds as well as futures securities. 1.7trillion was invested in structured products. Bank executives were warned that borrowing spiked to cover for share market investment. Despite the share market volatility, equities are not riskiest. Private placement presents the highest risk. Banks are also funding out of balance sheet mezzanine financing, which is investing in shares of private companies via loans.

About 20% of assets from wealth management are invested into these types of financing. Good companies are targeted for the financing arrangement as it increases leverage risk. Risks have increase since the stock market crash and bubble is forming. Many see this as the only way for making profits due to low interest rate environment. Asset managers are finding it tough to find great investments. There are about 200billion excess funds with nowhere to invest except considering for share market. Moody's reported that weak share market could adversely affect bank's asset quality and profits due to weak stock lending and share market related custody services. Moody's expects more defaults on company debt as borrowers struggle on repaying their leverage. Wealth management as a whole should be revamped and risks are real.

Regulators have not been interfering with the investments. They have paid close scrutiny on funds raised from short term products in wealth management. These money are invested in long term projects which presents a mismatch. Asset management executives support more disclosure in investment products. Same rule and standardization should apply to the products similar to public funds. Retail investors ought to be protected by regulators by enhancing these measures. All regulatory bodies from China have pursued different goals and agendas and neglected on coordination. Each focused on their own segments. It is not effective due to loophole with different frameworks, especially in wealth management space. There are some who praise the innovative form of segmentation. Top policymakers have the ultimate power to pass through legislations for unification of regulations. There were examples of cooperation in the past. For instance, in 2003, CBRC as well as CSRC jointly instructed banks and asset managers to be more transparent in their pool of capital. However it still lacks results as banks tried to transfer out the capital by channeling to other companies.

Capital pool enterprise is closely linked to wealth management package for stocks and corporate bonds investment. CSRC allowed fund manager and broker to push and market wealth management package. CBRC followed suit for banks and CIRC launched similar wealth management package rules for insurance enterprises. Each regulator are doing their best on its own area of expertise. However unification is still yet to be implemented to standardize regulations in wealth management space.

Chinese New Year 2018, Year of the Dog, is on Friday 16th February.

The home for trading financial activities and the venues for financial service providers, to take part in their activities is a Financial Centre. The participants in this financial centers are Central Banks, Stock exchange, Financial intermediaries, etc. China's economy occupies a potent position globally in financial marketing, to meet the situation, several financial centres are strengthening their growth in the economy. The Vice president and the Chief Executive for Principal International, spoke recently with CIMB, Principal and gave an analysis stating that until 2003 China is not listed in the top twenties in World's Biggest Companies record, but that scenario was changed within a short period, and in the year 2009, five companies from China were added to the list. Fortunately, among those five companies, three companies are in the top five in the World's Biggest Companies list. This shows how tremendously China's economy is growing. The chief executive also stated that China is currently in the fifth position in the world in financial market. The chief executive with his experience expressed and highlighted that, China is following some growth models, with which it can contribute some percentage of its GDP to the growth. With this the demand for household goods increases, which results in the economic growth. He confidently stated that China will be in the leading position in its financial growth in upcoming years.

Structural Changes in growth model:

To reduce the regional disparities , growth needs to be more balanced in the economic development, where the comparison of the local and global and rising income inequalities may lead a rise in inflation. During the 2009 crisis, China remained strong with GDP growth as it is less dependent on its export markets. This made the remaining global markets to look at the Chine's growth model. The China's growth model report shows that there is a rise in the share of the investment in the government policies and a decline in private consumption. The reason for the fall in the share of GDP is high investment growth and weak employment growth ultimately resulted the labor income, further falls in national income and personal income. Both extreme levels made a fall in the share of GDP. In this situation the China took an active step by increasing the domestic consumption by generating employment opportunities and enhancing welfare, growth for its citizens and sequentially maintaining social stability. The consequences still worsened the China's economy for a short period.

Balancing the Economy by depending on Exports

China's re balancing growth at one level fell over 7% and 3% in the years 2007 and 2010 respectively. To some extent export and import played a recovery role, but only for a short period. When one compares the growth level of import and exports, the investment boom is strong and more for the export but it is lower than that of the import growth, the reason behind is China is weak in advanced country markets, this made the economy to absorb large amounts of China's imports. To adjust the economic imbalances China concentrated the foreign exchange markets to counter the growth imbalances. The statistical data says that in the year 2010, China accumulated nearly $448 billion of foreign exchange reserves. This trend continued in the 2011 first few months and it accumulated another $196 billion of foreign exchange reserves. On an average nearly $200 billion reserve accumulation was made by the economy in the next three quarter's highlights the Chinese Financial Centers and continued in the foreign exchange market.

Financial Development and Reforms

China's twelfth five-year plan gave more priority for the Financial development and reforms. In this contest China's government identified most effective financial system which can play an important role by bringing some of the changes like by increasing the production to reduce the inefficiencies in the market. China's introduced a reformed banking system and lend more small and medium sectors instead of large enterprises where there is less employment opportunities. This banking system worked wonders and there appeared a good development in the nonperforming loans, this significant change increased the assets. Secondly, China liberalized the interest rates as part in banking reforms. Currently the government imposed a ceiling on deposit rates. By analyzing all the areas if all the financial centers are regulatory and supervisory then China can lead a new global financial hub with Chinese characteristics.